You are viewing oldcharliebrown

oldcharliebrown - 2008 Analysis: Top Fantasy/SF Markets, and New Authors [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
oldcharliebrown

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

2008 Analysis: Top Fantasy/SF Markets, and New Authors [Mar. 19th, 2009|01:09 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Share Next Entry
F&SF: 5%
Analog: 5%
Asimov's: 20%
Baen's Universe: 21%
Intergalactic Medicine Show: 32%
Interzone: 40%
Realms of Fantasy: 51%
Clarkesworld: 61%
Strange Horizons: 68%
Weird Tales: 72%
Chizine: 78%
Cosmos: 80%
Fantasy Magazine: 88%

I offer no great conclusions with these results . . . apart that FM might have too many "new" authors. In any case, business models are different between magazines, and "new" authors might not be a part of that model. For those that care, the initial basis for "new" was applying Campbell eligibility structure, as a starting point, and anyone exceeding that was no longer considered "new." This seemed the easiest, simpliest way to break this down. If anyone has any questions please let me know.
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: oldcharliebrown
2009-03-19 07:06 pm (UTC)

(Link)

I do have a life . . . and a wife . . . and would like to keep both, please :p